Although we have the impression that we understand the urban texture in which we live, the city still holds surprises in the way it communicates everyday aspects, situations, and cultural history. The paper proposes visual signs using infographics to highlight “invisible” urban details for the hurried passerby.

Presentation – World LUMEN Congress, 26th-30th May 2021.

The discussion aimed at current directions in artistic research concerning collaborative practices. It was proposed to analyse the status and the possibilities of artistic research development by providing concrete examples. Collaboration can be a working process between artists and can be found at an interdisciplinary or inter-institutional level. Collaboration can play a key role in personal artistic practice or be a key part of community formation and development or welcome discussions.

Participants:
Prof. PhD. Ruxandra Demetrescu (UNArte Doctoral School)
PhD. Alexandru Berceanu (CINETic UNATC)
PhD. student Michele Bressan (PhD candidate of UNArte, 2^nd year)
Prof. PhD. Iosif Kiraly (UNArte)
PhD. Maria Drăghici (research assistant of UNATC, UNArte doctorate)
Stud. Dana Pârvulescu (student at UNArte – ITA)
PhD. Lea Rasovszky (PhD candidate of UNArte, 4^th year)
PhD. arch. Teodora Ungureanu (Urbanism Doctoral School, UAUIM, 4^th year)
Director of the Doctoral School, Prof. univ. PhD. arch. Dragoș Gheorghiu

Moderator: PhD candidate Maria Mandea

Main topics:

• creation of artistic groups and finding a common working concept
• collaboration in limited projects and long-term collaboration
• collaborative projects and institutional developments
• working with and in communities
• the studio as a collaborative workspace
• belonging to international groups
• artistic research and interdisciplinary collaborations
• collaboration in absentia, working with archives, collaboration dislocated in time and space

The workshop is part of the development of the designer’s doctoral project on the topic of Origami folding structures and contributions to their applicability in product design. The workshop was carried out with the support of ASAP Romania and The Institute.

Held in UNArte’s Amphitheatre Hall at 28 Griviței Street, the conference started with the presentation of some of the art projects Dr Vytautas Michelkevičius put forward. The presentation opened a free discussion about artistic research starting from the identification of different concepts in artistic research. The discussions raised questions about the importance of language in artistic research, the inclusion of modernisation in artistic research that projects a new approach to research, starting from taking up ideas and concepts studied and used in artistic practice. The conference ended with a statement about how artistic research allows artists to have freedom of expression while being recognized for their work.

The Research Laboratory Adio Cercetării (Farewell to Research) started with an exhibition organized in the period 23 September – 5 October 2021 at UNAGaleria, 29 Băiculești street, Bucharest, followed by a performative conference organized within the exhibition at UNAGaleria in the period 4-5 October 2021, with the participation of the artists: Arnas Anskaitis (Vilnius), Erick Beltran (Helsinki), Eva Bubla (Budapest), Søren Thilo Funder (Bergen), Irina Gheorghe (Dublin), Anawana Haloba (Bergen), Stephanie Misa (Helsinki), Cornel Moraru (Bucharest), Tomáš Moravec (Prague), Laura von Niederhausen (Zürich), Tra Thi Thanh Nguyen (Budapest), Lea Rasovsky (Bucharest), Kai Ziegner (Zürich).

Similar to how Paul Feyerabend once questioned the dominance of rational knowledge in Farewell to Reason, this curatorial project will in turn question the dominant trend of academisized research that has reigned in art now for at least ten years. Today as well the danger lurks that “artistic research” will be encapsulated by academic routines and institutional stereotypes which will seriously impede creativity and artistic reflection. How do we prevent the fundamental dynamics and transformational potential – often described as processes without a protocol – of an as yet productive field from eventually becoming part of a hegemonic, controlling machine as a result of methodological processes of normalization. Could a “farewell” to such gentrified artistic research produce novel forms of articulation while proceeding from the perspective of contemporary art? Above all it needs to be emphasized that, in line with Feyerabend’s treatise, “farewell” should not be seen as a denial of importance, but particularly as showing the limitation of being increasingly institutionalized. To say farewell is not a departure, but a re-visit and a re-start.

The curatorial project “Farewell to Research” intends to provide a clear and constructive contribution to such re-thinking and re-evaluation. It departs from the assumption that the current ontological impasse – the continued repetition of the academic question “What is artistic research?” – could be overcome by formulating a proposition based on a recomposition of three conceptual spaces (creative practice, artistic thinking, curatorial strategies) that intersect when artistic research takes place.

By deploying such a point of view, “Farewell to Research” clearly takes a distance from a series of misconceptions that have accumulated around the concept of artistic research over the past decade. Through preformed, static categories, these misconceptions seem to reduce research in the arts to a noun, whereas the above-described dynamics and the related provisional quality rather ask for the dynamics of a verb. With such characterizations, the issue of the specificity of artistic knowledge production appears. Arnas Anskaitis addresses this issue by drawing attention to the structure of artistic arguments that he views as assemblages of semantics and noise: arguments that cannot be presented in written text, but in diagrams. Cornel Moraru underlines a similar way of presenting: artistic research as a practice of affective resonance, an intersection of the visual, technology, sound, and the performative. Erick Beltran also elucidates the role that transparancy has played in Western epistemology: according to him, it is up to artistic research to re-imagine truth as opaque and difficult to attain. Finally, Soren Thilo Funder emphasizes the importance of artistic research as a necessary reassessment of speculative knowledge: by means of alienating strategies (such as experimenting with contemporary horror fiction) he aims at extracting speculation from the dictate of absolute capitalism, that embraces algorithmic transactions and disregards environmental exhaustion.The issue of artistic research as another form of knowledge production could also be approached from a different perspective, i.e. how could such a form of artistic research contribute to the – critical – articulation of the urgencies we are confronted with today.  Laura von Niederhausern, for example, argues that artistic thinking is able to generate space for a different sense of time: a form of thinking that, in contrast to the dominant chrononormativity, underscores contradictory time rhythms, asyncronicities, unpredictable timings and incommensurable temporalities. Such a different sense of time can also help us to fathom deeper layers of history, says Kai Ziegner. According to him, artistic research – while archiving, documenting – should stress, in a performative way, the historical moments of breakdown and the associated social changes.

In line with this, the question arises whether and how artistic research itself could contribute to social change. Tra Thi Thanh Nguyen claims that both the challenges of the current online world and the conditions of creativity will eventually lead to a mode of artistic research increasingly emphasizing its social position and role. A role that, as Eva Bubla outlines, is connected to catalyze processes. Precisely because of its interconnectedness, solidarity and sharing, artistic research is capable of making a difference.

Various strategies are available for such an artistic modification of thinking. In his proposition, Tomas Moravec analyzes and tests the strategy of material displacement: an aesthetic disconnection of object and location. Irina Gheorghe also performs an epistemological opportunity based on materiality: practices of deviation that contribute to the generation of other forms of knowledge because of a link between matter and the body. Such forms of knowledge could ultimately lead to the deconstruction, deconditioning, or decolonialization of established knowledge systems. Anawana Haloba accentuates that precisely artistic research should be committed to such causes: it is up to artistic research to put the needs and interests of the epistemologically disenfranchised at the forefront of knowledge production. Something that, as Stephanie Misa states, could lead to a performative strategy of discomfort: a discomfort that stems from being out-of-place, unheard, unseen, or bullied into submission – an indelible mark that has been carried far too long by those who the knowledge system has forgotten, or chosen to forget.

In the opening, Mihaela Moțăianu and Cornelia Moțăianu briefly presented the exhibition, the works on display and talked about the idea behind the exhibition and how it was carried out. The round table is a level of collaboration. Starting from the topics discussed at European level in different international conferences such as ELIA Biennial Conference 2020, Artistic Doctorate Resources2, New European Bauhaus Collective (NBC), there were many questions focusing on collaborative thinking. Both guests and hosts answered these questions and also shared their own experiences.